| |
| Don't let Jupiter make you feel inadequate little guy. |
It dawned on me that Pluto's dismissal from "Club Planet" was for most people of my age group the first time something we regarded as a major fact was debunked. You're in college and you finally are in the throes of knowledge all the while feeling that you're young, current, and far from out of date. You're not that crazy elder that believes that you clean a computer's hard drive by sticking the CPU in the dishwasher . You're savvy- you're knowledgeable, and you are so wrong.... wait, what??
Finding out that Pluto does not qualify as a planet was a little shocking. I can only imagine how angered people were to hear that- guess what- no, the Earth is NOT flat. Even in the face of objective science, people hate being wrong, it's human nature. Being wrong sucks- even if your fallacy was caused by a massive misconception believed even by reputable scholars.
And let's face it- the
Pair the horror of being wrong with a natural love of underdogs and what do you have? You have a swarm of Pluto sympathizers. The debate stems from the question of whether the status of planet is based upon the size of the object or some other, intangible quality. For many the question lingers, what's the harm in calling an object that is technically too small to be a planet a planet?
Our panic is not unlike the recent distress over the debated new astrology sign. Do we need to get over it? Definitely, but give us time.
In the meantime we'll be the crazy old people whom children correct for listing nine planets instead of eight.